From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colo., Non-Profit Corp. v. Sebelius

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 24, 2014
571 U.S. 1171 (2014)

Opinion

No. 13A691.

January 24, 2014, Decided


Application for an injunction having been submitted to Justice Sotomayor and by her referred to the Court, the Court orders: If the employer applicants inform the Secretary of Health and Human Services in writing that they are non-profit organizations that hold themselves out as religious and have religious objections to providing coverage for contraceptive services, the respondents are enjoined from enforcing against the applicants the challenged provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and related regulations pending final disposition of the appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. To meet the condition for injunction pending appeal, applicants need not use the form prescribed by the Government and need not send copies to third-party administrators. The Court issues this order based on all of the circumstances of the case, and this order should not be construed as an expression of the Court’s views on the merits.


Summaries of

Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colo., Non-Profit Corp. v. Sebelius

Supreme Court of the United States
Jan 24, 2014
571 U.S. 1171 (2014)
Case details for

Little Sisters of the Poor Home for the Aged, Denver, Colo., Non-Profit Corp. v. Sebelius

Case Details

Full title:LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR HOME FOR THE AGED, DENVER, COLORADO, A Colorado…

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Jan 24, 2014

Citations

571 U.S. 1171 (2014)
134 S. Ct. 1022
187 L. Ed. 2d 867
82 U.S.L.W. 3446

Citing Cases

Univ. of Notre Dame v. Sebelius

The Supreme Court's recent decision to grant a temporary injunction in a similar RFRA challenge suggests to…

Christian & Missionary Alliance Found., Inc. v. Burwell

Despite the regulation's required use of a proscribed form, the Supreme Court has dispensed with that…