From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. v. Pulse Trading, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 23, 2012
478 F. App'x 671 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-1508

07-23-2012

LIQUIDNET HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PULSE TRADING, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. ROBERT R. GILMAN, Gilman Clark & Hunter LLC, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was THOMAS J. CLARK.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Case No. 07-CV-6886, Judge Shira Ann Scheindlin.

JUDGMENT

JOSEPH A. MICALLEF, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

ROBERT R. GILMAN, Gilman Clark & Hunter LLC, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was THOMAS J. CLARK.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_____________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. v. Pulse Trading, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jul 23, 2012
478 F. App'x 671 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Liquidnet Holdings, Inc. v. Pulse Trading, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LIQUIDNET HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PULSE TRADING, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jul 23, 2012

Citations

478 F. App'x 671 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. Adobe, Inc.

Inv. Tech. Grp., Inc, v. Liquidnet Holdings, Inc., 759 F.Supp.2d 387, 410 (S.D.N.Y.2010) (alteration in…

LaserDynamics U.S., LLC v. Cinram Grp., Inc.

"To willfully infringe a patent, the patent must exist and the accused infringer must have knowledge of it.…