From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liptrot v. Theater at Madison Square Garden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 2001
281 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted February 7, 2001.

March 5, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), entered April 14, 2000, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Gordon Silber, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Andrew B. Kaufman of counsel), for appellants.

Hurwitz Hurwitz, P.C., New City, N.Y. (Martin Hurwitz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff alleged that the heel of her shoe caught on a step as she was descending an interior stairway in the defendants' theater, as a result of, inter alia, inadequate lighting and crowd control, and a lack of handrails. The defendants failed to provide evidence in admissible form to demonstrate their entitlement to judgment in their favor as a matter of law. The defendants did not establish that the stairway in question provided a safe means of ingress and egress and was adequately lighted (see, Wilder v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., 175 A.D.2d 534; see also, Quinlan v. Cecchini, 41 N.Y.2d 686; Miccoli v. Kotz, 278 A.D.2d 460 [2d Dept., Dec. 26, 2000]; Shirman v. New York City Tr. Auth., 264 A.D.2d 832, 833; Kurth v. Wallkill Assocs., 132 A.D.2d 529), and that they took adequate crowd control measures (cf., Palmieri v. Ringling Bros. Barnum Bailey Combined Shows, 237 A.D.2d 589). Therefore, the defendants' motion was properly denied.


Summaries of

Liptrot v. Theater at Madison Square Garden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 5, 2001
281 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Liptrot v. Theater at Madison Square Garden

Case Details

Full title:CAROLYN LIPTROT, RESPONDENT, v. THEATER AT MADISON SQUARE GARDEN, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 5, 2001

Citations

281 A.D.2d 398 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
721 N.Y.S.2d 388

Citing Cases

Acosta v. Ortiz

se proximity to the stairway, had plaintiff desired for her path to be illuminated, all she needed to do was…