From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lipton v. Marks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1945
269 App. Div. 1055 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

December 17, 1945.


Plaintiffs sue to foreclose a vendor's lien on personal property sold and delivered to defendants. Defendants' answer, in addition to a general denial, contains a counterclaim alleging breach of warranty in the sale of the merchandise and praying for a money judgment of $500, paid on account of the purchase price. Defendants seasonably filed a demand for a jury trial of the issues raised by the counterclaim and moved for an order staying the trial of plaintiffs' action pending the jury trial. The motion was denied and defendants appeal. Order reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. Defendants are entitled to a jury trial as matter of right. ( City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Hartshorne, 264 App. Div. 287, and cases cited.) Hagarty, Acting P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lipton v. Marks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1945
269 App. Div. 1055 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Lipton v. Marks

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL LIPTON et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 1055 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Citing Cases

Sefranka v. Sefranka

The authorities are to the contrary. ( City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. Hartshorne, 264 A.D. 287; Lipton v.…