From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Links at North Hills v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 1996
226 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 25, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (John Lockman, J.).


While defendants were entitled to insist that the defective water seepage condition in the basement be corrected and that the recreational facilities be completed, rescission of the contract was not their remedy, as neither the basement leak nor the unfinished recreational facilities constituted material breaches pursuant to the purchase agreement. We have considered defendants' remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Kupferman, Ross and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

Links at North Hills v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 25, 1996
226 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Links at North Hills v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:LINKS AT NORTH HILLS, Respondent, v. ROBERT W. BAKER et al., Appellants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 279 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 287

Citing Cases

Eldridge v. Shaw

We also reject plaintiffs' contention that the stipulation should be rescinded on the ground that defendants…

Capece v. Robbins

Contrary to the plaintiffs' assertion, the trust never cancelled the contract. Moreoever, the trust's failure…