From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lingshan v. Comm'r Labor

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 26, 2014
122 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

518929

11-26-2014

In the Matter of the Claim of LINGSHAN LI, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Lingshan Li, New York City, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.


Lingshan Li, New York City, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Gary Leibowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Before: PETERS, P.J., STEIN, GARRY, EGAN JR. and DEVINE, JJ.

Opinion Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 3, 2013, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she failed to file a valid original claim.

Claimant filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits, effective July 2, 2012, that was denied on the basis that she did not meet the requirements for filing a valid original claim. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately agreed, and this appeal ensued.

Substantial evidence in the record supports the Board's decision, and we affirm. In order to file a valid claim for unemployment insurance benefits, a claimant must show that he or she earned “remuneration of one and one-half times the high calendar quarter remuneration within the base period” (Labor Law § 527[1][d] ; [2][a]; see Matter of Chernavsky [Commissioner of Labor], 76 A.D.3d 739, 740, 905 N.Y.S.2d 525 [2010] ). Claimant did not earn 1 ½ times the $7,410.76 that she earned in the high calendar quarter during either her base period or alternate base period (see Labor Law §§ 520, 527 ). Remuneration is deemed to have been earned on the date of payment and, thus, the Board properly declined to consider monies that claimant received after the periods in question had ended (see Labor Law § 516 ; Matter of Rodriguez [New York City Dept. of Educ.-Commissioner of Labor], 24 A.D.3d 934, 934, 805 N.Y.S.2d 683 [2005] ).

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Lingshan v. Comm'r Labor

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 26, 2014
122 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Lingshan v. Comm'r Labor

Case Details

Full title:LINGSHAN LI, Appellant. v. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 26, 2014

Citations

122 A.D.3d 1224 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
997 N.Y.S.2d 824
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 8295