From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindenwood Realty Co. v. Feldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 1972
40 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Summary

In Lindenwood Realty Co. v. Feldman (40 A.D.2d 855) the Appellate Division reversed on the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice GULOTTA.

Summary of this case from Birchwood Assoc. v. Steigauf

Opinion

November 20, 1972


In an action by a landlord to recover damages for alleged breach of a lease by the lessees, plaintiff appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the 9th and 10th Judicial Districts, dated January 6, 1971, which (1) reversed an order of the First District Court, Suffolk County, entered April 21, 1970, granting plaintiff's motion to vacate defendants' demand for a jury trial, and (2) denied the motion. Order of the Appellate Term reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and order of the District Court affirmed, on the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Gulotta in the Appellate Term ( Lindenwood Realty Co. v. Feldman, 72 Misc.2d 68). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Munder, Shapiro and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Gulotta, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Lindenwood Realty Co. v. Feldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 20, 1972
40 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

In Lindenwood Realty Co. v. Feldman (40 A.D.2d 855) the Appellate Division reversed on the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice GULOTTA.

Summary of this case from Birchwood Assoc. v. Steigauf
Case details for

Lindenwood Realty Co. v. Feldman

Case Details

Full title:LINDENWOOD REALTY CO., Appellant, v. BERNARD FELDMAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1972

Citations

40 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Riverbay v. Lattimore

In so doing, the court favored the view of the Second Department, that section 259-c of the Property Law…

Import Alley of Mid-Island v. Mid-Island

Subsequently, the court directed separate trials of the two actions and the tenant has appealed. ¶ While the…