From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindbeck v. Glebe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
May 9, 2013
No. C12-6014 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. C12-6014 RBL/KLS

05-09-2013

ANTON A.H. LINDBECK, Petitioner, v. PATRICK GLEBE, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the petition for writ of habeas corpus, the response, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.
(2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 4) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner, counsel for Respondent and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

____________

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lindbeck v. Glebe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
May 9, 2013
No. C12-6014 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Lindbeck v. Glebe

Case Details

Full title:ANTON A.H. LINDBECK, Petitioner, v. PATRICK GLEBE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

No. C12-6014 RBL/KLS (W.D. Wash. May. 9, 2013)

Citing Cases

Dixon v. Yordy

Rather, he was allowed instead to present the issues in his post-conviction action. Similarly, in Lindbeck v.…