From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liles v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 16, 1933
148 So. 337 (Ala. Crim. App. 1933)

Opinion

8 Div. 648.

May 16, 1933.

Appeal from Law and Equity Court, Lauderdale County; Orlan B. Hill, Judge.

Dossie Liles was convicted on a charge of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Bradshaw Barnett, of Florence, for appellant.

Thos. E. Knight, Jr., Atty. Gen., for the State.


The deputy sheriff, who is the only witness, saw defendant down in a ditch where people resorted to relieve the call of nature. Defendant was "hunkered down on his knee." The deputy went down into the ditch and near where he had seen defendant on his knees and there found under some brush three half-pint bottles of whisky. There was no evidence connecting the defendant with the possession, and the court erred in refusing to give as requested in writing the general affirmative charge in his behalf. The following authorities are in point: McKinnon v. State, 22 Ala. App. 654, 119 So. 596; Tuggle v. State, 22 Ala. App. 89, 112 So. 540; Hayes v. State, 22 Ala. App. 264, 114 So. 674, and authorities there cited.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Liles v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
May 16, 1933
148 So. 337 (Ala. Crim. App. 1933)
Case details for

Liles v. State

Case Details

Full title:LILES v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: May 16, 1933

Citations

148 So. 337 (Ala. Crim. App. 1933)
148 So. 337

Citing Cases

Parker v. State

The evidence presented is not sufficient to sustain a conviction. Tuggle v. State, 22 Ala. App. 89, 112 So.…

Chancellor v. State

Mere finding of prohibited liquor on defendant's premises is insufficient to warrant a conviction. Trammell…