Opinion
No. 346 CAF 22-01163
06-30-2023
IN THE MATTER OF MITCHEL LICHTMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. MARIATERESA CERAVOLO, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, AND DAVID LEFEBVRE, RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
KELLY WHITE DONOFRIO LLP, ROCHESTER (DONALD A. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. GALLO & IACOVANGELO, LLP, ROCHESTER (CRAIG D. CHARTIER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. MARYBETH D. BARNET, MIDDLESEX, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.
KELLY WHITE DONOFRIO LLP, ROCHESTER (DONALD A. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
GALLO & IACOVANGELO, LLP, ROCHESTER (CRAIG D. CHARTIER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
MARYBETH D. BARNET, MIDDLESEX, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, OGDEN, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Brian D. Dennis, J.), entered May 27, 2022, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order granted an order of protection against petitioner.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Ceravolo v Lefebvre ([appeal No. 1] - A.D.3d - [June 30, 2023] [4th Dept 2023]).