From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Licciardi v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 25, 2006
No. CIV-S-05-2072 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV-S-05-2072 MCE KJM P.

January 25, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has paid the filing fee.

The court's records reveal that petitioner previously has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus attacking the 1995 San Joaquin County conviction and sentence challenged in this case. The previous application was filed on February 25, 2002 and was decided on the merits on March 20, 2003. Licciardi v. State of California, Civ. No. S-02-148 LKK PAN P; Accordingly, this petition is successive and must be authorized by the Court of Appeals. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3); Rule 9, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. See also Henderson v. Lampert, 396 F.3d 1049, 1053 (9th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Henderson v. Hill, ___ U.S. ___, 2005 WL 1671574 (2005); Reyes v. Vaughn, 276 F.Supp.2d 1027, 1029 (C.D. Cal. 2003). Petitioner has not demonstrated he has received such authorization.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be transferred to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Licciardi v. State

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 25, 2006
No. CIV-S-05-2072 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2006)
Case details for

Licciardi v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT LICCIARDI, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 25, 2006

Citations

No. CIV-S-05-2072 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2006)