From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1983
453 N.E.2d 1254 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Decided July 7, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, JOSEPH LOMBARDO, J.

Norman H. Dachs for appellant.

A. Paul Goldblum for respondent.



On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 93 A.D.2d 814). This being an action between carriers for a declaratory judgment as to the division of responsibility between them, the reasoning of Chrysler Leasing Corp. v Public Administrator, N.Y. County ( 85 A.D.2d 410) is not apposite.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER and SIMONS.


Summaries of

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jul 7, 1983
453 N.E.2d 1254 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Prudential Prop. Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jul 7, 1983

Citations

453 N.E.2d 1254 (N.Y. 1983)
453 N.E.2d 1254
466 N.Y.S.2d 965

Citing Cases

Porter v. Shapiro

for the injuries suffered by the plaintiffs was established at trial and the defendants do not contest that…

Matter of Wedinger v. Goldberger

Motion by the petitioners to expand the record on appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the…