From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lezcano v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 14, 2004
11 A.D.3d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4303

October 14, 2004.

Amended judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.), entered February 11, 2004, which, after a jury trial, awarded plaintiffs damages in accordance with CPLR article 50-B, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Williams, Marlow and Sweeny, JJ.


There was unrebutted testimony at trial that plaintiff Secundino was injured when he fell from a scaffold not equipped with guardrails or other protective devices. Labor Law § 240 (1) imposes absolute liability on owners, contractors and their agents for any breach of the statutory duty that proximately causes a plaintiff's injury in these circumstances ( Panek v. County of Albany, 99 NY2d 452, 457), a duty that is nondelegable ( Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co., 81 NY2d 494, 500). The failure of any party to produce another witness to the event is no basis for denying a directed verdict as to liability, absent a bona fide issue, based on more than speculation, as to the injured party's credibility ( Urrea v. Sedgwick Ave. Assoc., 191 AD2d 319). Defendants' liability was established as a matter of law by clear evidence that the injured worker had been provided a scaffold without guardrails or other protective devices that might have prevented his fall ( see Morrison v. City of New York, 306 AD2d 86).

The jury's monetary awards do not deviate from what is reasonable compensation under the circumstances.


Summaries of

Lezcano v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 14, 2004
11 A.D.3d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Lezcano v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:SECUNDINO LEZCANO et al., Respondents, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 14, 2004

Citations

11 A.D.3d 303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
782 N.Y.S.2d 451

Citing Cases

O'Shea v. N. Y. City Sch. Constr. Auth.

In the instant case, questions of fact exist as to whether, in view of the wash-down work being performed by…

Mininno v. Mega Contracting, Inc.

A plaintiff under Labor Law § 240 (1) need only show that the injuries were at least partially attributable…