From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lexington Ins. Co. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2019
168 A.D.3d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8294 Index 650574/15

01-31-2019

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Defendant–Respondent Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc., Defendant–Appellant.

Pasich LLP, New York (Jeffrey L. Schulman of counsel), for appellant. Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP, New York (Michael J. Rossignol of counsel), for Lexington Insurance Company, respondent. Coughlin Duffy LLP, New York (Lorraine M. Armenti of counsel), for Steadfast Insurance Company, Inc., respondent.


Pasich LLP, New York (Jeffrey L. Schulman of counsel), for appellant.

Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP, New York (Michael J. Rossignol of counsel), for Lexington Insurance Company, respondent.

Coughlin Duffy LLP, New York (Lorraine M. Armenti of counsel), for Steadfast Insurance Company, Inc., respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Moulton, JJ.

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Ellen M. Coin, J.), entered June 19, 2017, which granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to pay any part of the deductible under the policy issued by defendant Steadfast Insurance Company to defendant Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc., and so declared, and granted Steadfast's motion for summary judgment declaring that Langan must reimburse it for the deductible, and so declared, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motions denied, and the declarations vacated.

The motion court erred in concluding that plaintiff was not obligated to pay any part of Langan's deductible under the Steadfast policy and that Langan owed Steadfast the amount of the deductible without first determining Steadfast's and plaintiff's duties to defend and to indemnify and, if necessary, the priority of coverage (see Sport Rock Intl., Inc. v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa., 65 A.D.3d 12, 18, 878 N.Y.S.2d 339 [1st Dept. 2009], appeal withdrawn 14 N.Y.3d 796, 899 N.Y.S.2d 130, 925 N.E.2d 934 [2010] ). That determination requires consideration of all relevant policies and, with regard to the duty to indemnify, the facts as found in the underlying personal injury action (see id. at 29, 878 N.Y.S.2d 339 ; BP A.C. Corp. v. One Beacon Ins. Group, 8 N.Y.3d 708, 714, 840 N.Y.S.2d 302, 871 N.E.2d 1128 [2007] ).

In addition, we note that the court failed to reduce the disputed deductible by $ 25,000, as provided for in the Steadfast policy in the event of the resolution of a claim by mediation.


Summaries of

Lexington Ins. Co. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 31, 2019
168 A.D.3d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Lexington Ins. Co. v. Steadfast Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Lexington Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Steadfast Insurance…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 31, 2019

Citations

168 A.D.3d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
93 N.Y.S.3d 27
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 693

Citing Cases

Chaney v. James River Ins. Co.

This has bearing on the indemnity issue before this court. However, as defendant argues, and as plaintiffs…