Opinion
Civil Action 5:22-cv-18
06-21-2022
ORDER
LISA GODBEY WOOD, JUDGE
After an independent and de novo review of the entire record, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dkt. No. 5. Plaintiff did not file Objections to this Report and Recommendation. In fact, this Court's mailing was returned as undeliverable, with the notations: "Return to Sender, Refused, Unable to Forward." Dkt. No. 6 at 1.
The Court presumes this mailing was returned as undeliverable due to Plaintiff's transfer or release. Plaintiff's failure to notify the Court of any change in address provides another reason to dismiss his Complaint. Local R. 11.1; Dkt. No. 4 at 3.
Thus, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court, DISMISSES without prejudice Plaintiff's Complaint for failure to follow this Court's Order and failure to prosecute, DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter the appropriate judgment, and DENIES Plaintiff in forma pauperis status on appeal.
SO ORDERED.