Opinion
2011-12-22
In the Matter of the Claim of Michael LEWIS, Respondent, v. STEWART'S MARKETING CORPORATION et al., Appellants.Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Walsh & Hacker, Albany (Sean F. Nicolette of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Iris A. Steel of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent.
Walsh & Hacker, Albany (Sean F. Nicolette of counsel), for appellants. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Iris A. Steel of counsel), for Workers' Compensation Board, respondent.
Before: PETERS, J.P., ROSE, McCARTHY, GARRY and EGAN JR., JJ.
PETERS, J.P.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed August 24, 2009, which ruled that claimant sustained a permanent total disability and awarded workers' compensation benefits.
Claimant sustained serious injuries to his head and right shoulder while working for the employer in 1997 and was awarded workers' compensation benefits. In 2008, the employer sought a hearing to determine the degree and permanency of claimant's disability. Claimant thereafter provided an updated medical report indicating that he had a permanent total disability. The employer submitted an independent medical report indicating that claimant suffered a moderate partial disability of a permanent nature and was capable of performing some type of work. The employer's request to cross-examine claimant and his physician concerning claimant's ability to work was denied, and the Workers' Compensation Law Judge determined that claimant had a permanent total disability as a result of his work-related injuries and awarded benefits. Upon review, the Workers' Compensation Board affirmed, prompting this appeal by the employer and its workers' compensation carrier.
We reverse. The employer and carrier argue that the request to cross-examine claimant and his physician was improperly denied. It is clear that, where the employer makes a timely request to do so, it should be afforded an opportunity to obtain the testimony of the claimant and his or her physician ( see 12 NYCRR 300.10[c]; Matter of Carr v. Cairo Fire Dist., 80 A.D.3d 810, 811–812, 913 N.Y.S.2d 832 [2011]; Matter of Pistone v. Sam's Club, 295 A.D.2d 875, 875, 743 N.Y.S.2d 907 [2002] ). Moreover, inasmuch as the record contains conflicting medical reports regarding the nature of claimant's disability, denial of the employer's request to cross-examine claimant's physician clearly prejudiced the employer ( see Matter of Carr v. Cairo Fire Dist., 80 A.D.3d at 812, 913 N.Y.S.2d 832; Matter of Pistone v. Sam's Club, 295 A.D.2d at 876, 743 N.Y.S.2d 907; compare Matter of Robideau v. Van Rensselaer Manor, 56 A.D.3d 866, 867, 866 N.Y.S.2d 457 [2008] ).
ORDERED that decision is reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Workers' Compensation Board for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.