From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 27, 1990
567 So. 2d 50 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-2585.

September 27, 1990.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michele A. Lucas, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


The trial court erred by imposing one written sentence of twelve years in the Department of Corrections for two second-degree felonies and one third-degree felony. While the sentence was within the guidelines' recommended range of nine to twelve years' incarceration, it exceeded the statutory maximum of five years' incarceration for the third-degree felony of grand theft.

General sentences for multiple convictions are not proper. Rule 3.701(d)(12), Fla.R.Crim.P.; see Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla. 1977). The sentence is vacated, and we remand so that individual sentences may be given for each felony, including twelve years' incarceration for each of the second-degree felonies if that is deemed appropriate by the trial court, but not more than the statutory limit of five years for the third-degree felony.

Sentence VACATED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lewis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 27, 1990
567 So. 2d 50 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Lewis v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICKY B. LEWIS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 27, 1990

Citations

567 So. 2d 50 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Scott v. State

Two of the points raised by the defendant are of merit. First, defendant is correct in his contention that…

Nodel v. State

While it was neither raised nor argued herein, we are not unmindful of the fact that an improper general…