From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 2004
6 A.D.3d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-09063.

Decided April 5, 2004.

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated October 1, 2001, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fitzmaurice, J.), dated September 24, 2002, which granted the defendant's motion to disqualify the law firm of Lewis Lefcourt from representing him.

M. Theresa A. Faherty, New City, N.Y., for appellant. Cohen Hennessey Bienstock, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Peter Bienstock of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, BARRY A. COZIER, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Since the members of the law firm of Lewis Lefcourt were persons who ought to be called as witnesses at a hearing that was to be held ( see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-102[A] [ 22 NYCRR 1200.21(a)]; cf. S S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v. 777 S.H. Corp., 69 N.Y.2d 437, 445-446), the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant's motion to disqualify the law firm as counsel for the plaintiff ( see Korfmann v. Kemper Nat'l Ins. Co., 258 A.D.2d 508; Brunette v. Gianfelice, 171 A.D.2d 719).

ALTMAN, J.P., SCHMIDT, COZIER and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Goldberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 2004
6 A.D.3d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Lewis v. Goldberg

Case Details

Full title:STUART LEWIS, appellant, v. JUDITH ROSE GOLDBERG, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
774 N.Y.S.2d 370