From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Council v. Duic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1992
180 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

February 27, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert White, J.).


This action for false arrest and assault was commenced in August 1987. Jury selection began October 31, 1990, and was completed November 5, 1990. That same day, defense counsel learned from plaintiff's employment records, which had been subpoenaed, that plaintiff had been in an automobile accident and subpoenaed the records of that accident from Bellevue Hospital. Since these records would not be available until Tuesday, November 13, the matter was adjourned until the morning of that day.

When informed that the plaintiff's doctor would be unable to testify until November 20, the trial part sent the matter back to the IAS part. Plaintiff's attorney, who had never tried a jury case before, represented that with eight witnesses to be examined before the doctor, he believed the case would "go through Monday or Tuesday" (November 19-20). The court, however, accused plaintiff's counsel of deciding on additional witnesses just to "cover" himself for the purpose of the record, and after finding counsel was "doing nothing but stalling and holding up the Court", the IAS Judge imposed a sanction of $10,000 payable to the defendant Authority.

We find that, upon the record herein, the imposition of the sanctions against plaintiff's counsel was an abuse of discretion. The actions of counsel were not demonstrated to be intentional or in bad faith, especially when viewed in the light of his inexperience, and we therefore vacate the sanctions imposed.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Council v. Duic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 27, 1992
180 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Council v. Duic

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE COUNCIL, Appellant, v. JULIUS P. DUIC et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 583 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
580 N.Y.S.2d 297

Citing Cases

Principe v. Assay Partners

A final factor to be considered is the circumstances of the behavior ( 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [c] [2]). Given that…

Llantin v. Doe

Based on the uncontested facts, counsel's actions were neither intentional nor made in bad faith. Moreover,…