From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LERNER v. BRIN

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 18, 1992
608 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-456.

November 3, 1992. Rehearing Denied December 18, 1992.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Moie Tendrich, Judge.

Whitman, Wolfe Gross, and Irving J. Whitman, Miami, for appellant.

Michael A. Bienstock, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and GERSTEN, JJ.


Appellant, a beneficiary under her mother's will, appeals a final judgment in favor of appellee determining that appellant exerted undue influence on her mother. We affirm.

Appellant contends that the trial court's findings were not supported by competent and substantial evidence. Appellee asserts that the findings were supported by competent and substantial evidence.

Although one may have rachmones for appellant, the trial court's findings were supported by competent and substantial evidence, and as such, will not be disturbed on appeal. See Gegen v. Learey, 503 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); In re Estate of Carpenter, 253 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1971).

Yiddish. Rachmones: Pity, mercy, compassion. F. Kogos, Dictionary of Yiddish Slang and Idioms (Castlebooks 1967).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

LERNER v. BRIN

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 18, 1992
608 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

LERNER v. BRIN

Case Details

Full title:HILDA LERNER, APPELLANT, v. JACOB BRIN, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 18, 1992

Citations

608 So. 2d 519 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Park Adult Residential v. Dan Designs

The trial court may not consider the reasons why the deposit was not timely made.See Kosoy Kendall Assocs.,…

COOPER v. BRICKELL BAYVIEW REAL EST

§ 768.79(6)(a). This case is another of a recent series in which trial courts, obviously indulging a perhaps…