From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leonis v. Ambrosino

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 13, 1947
188 Misc. 820 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)

Opinion

March 13, 1947.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of The Bronx, SULLIVAN, J.

Joseph R. Brodsky and David M. Freedman for appellant.

David Ross and Louis Solomon for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


The proceeding herein was brought under paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of section 6 of the Office of Price Administration Rent Regulation for Housing in the New York City Defense-Rental Area ( 8 Federal Register 13918) and the landlord was not obliged to prove an "immediate compelling necessity" to recover possession, nor "good faith", which are requirements under subdivision (a) thereof ( 10 Federal Register 11668) ( Thorpe v. Jenkins, 187 Misc. 293; Geer v. Noonan, 187 Misc. 295). Also, it was error to charge the jury that the acceptance of rent by the landlord during the pendency of the proceeding prevented the landlord from recovering possession (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1410, subd. 8).

See, also, Greenberg v. Karnetsky, 188 Misc. 674. — [REP.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in the petition, with costs.

HAMMER, SHIENTAG and EDER, JJ., concur.

Order reversed.


Summaries of

Leonis v. Ambrosino

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Mar 13, 1947
188 Misc. 820 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)
Case details for

Leonis v. Ambrosino

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE LEONIS, Landlord, Appellant, v. JAMES AMBROSINO, Tenant, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1947

Citations

188 Misc. 820 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)
69 N.Y.S.2d 403

Citing Cases

Wagner Bldg. v. United Cigar-Whelan Stores Corp.

(Civ. Prac. Act, § 1410, subd. 8; Leonis v. Ambrosino, 188 Misc. 820.) It is undisputed that the petitions…

Wagner Bldg. v. United Cigar-Whelan Stores

It therefore becomes a matter of paramount importance to ascertain in fact when these summary proceedings…