From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leon v. Old Republic Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 29, 1990
561 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-1994.

May 29, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Edward N. Moore, J.

Peter Kneski, Miami, for appellants.

Hyman Kaplan, Miami, for appellee.

Before FERGUSON, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


Appellants Roy Leon and Roy Leon Customhouse Brokers, Inc., appeal an order of dismissal for failure to prosecute. We affirm.

Appellants, who will be referred to collectively as Leon, were defendants and counterplaintiffs below. After over one year had passed without record activity in the action, Leon moved for dismissal of the cause for failure to prosecute. The next day Leon filed a notice of deposition directed to appellee Old Republic Insurance Co. Thereafter, Old Republic also filed a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. At the hearing, Leon argued that the court should dismiss Old Republic's suit, but that the counterclaim should remain pending, because Leon had filed a notice of deposition prior to Old Republic's filing its motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute.

The trial court dismissed the entire action and was correct in doing so. Rule 1.420(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, provides for dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute. It does not contemplate the dismissal of isolated claims or counterclaims. Hanson v. Poteet, 556 So.2d 828, 828-30 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Leon v. Old Republic Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 29, 1990
561 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Leon v. Old Republic Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROY LEON, AND ROY LEON CUSTOMHOUSE BROKERS, INC., APPELLANTS, v. OLD…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 29, 1990

Citations

561 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Tinsley v. Mangonia Residence I, Ltd.

We agree. Rule 1.420(e) provides that, where there is a failure to prosecute, the "action" shall be…

Kaufman v. Schwartz

In addition, the fact that the stay was addressed to only two of the three counts should be of no moment,…