From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LENZ v. ROBINSON

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 10, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-248 (W.D. Pa. May. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-248.

May 10, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW this 10th day of May, 2006, after the plaintiff, William Lenz, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after an answer and Motion for Judgment of Non Pros or, in the alternative, Motion to Dismiss was submitted by the defendant, John N. Robinson, M.D., and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto and defendant having filed objections, and upon independent review of the motion and the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's Motion for Judgment of Non Pros or, in the alternative, Motion to Dismiss [Docket Entry 13] is DENIED.


Summaries of

LENZ v. ROBINSON

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 10, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-248 (W.D. Pa. May. 10, 2006)
Case details for

LENZ v. ROBINSON

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM LENZ, Plaintiff, v. JOHN N. ROBINSON, M.D., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 10, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-248 (W.D. Pa. May. 10, 2006)

Citing Cases

Keel-Johnson v. Amsbaugh

7 conflicts with the federal rules because Federal Rule 41(b) grants the court discretion to dismiss a claim…