holding that in an entrapment instruction practically identical to the one in issue in the instant case, "it was clearly implicit . . . that the burden of proof was placed upon the government."
Summary of this case from United States v. MartinezNo 75-6170.
May 19, 1976, OCTOBER TERM, 1975.
C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 525 F. 2d 878.
holding that in an entrapment instruction practically identical to the one in issue in the instant case, "it was clearly implicit . . . that the burden of proof was placed upon the government."
Summary of this case from United States v. MartinezFull title:LUJAN v. UNITED STATES
Court:U.S.
Date published: May 19, 1976
The burden is upon the party claiming settlement as a defense to prove that it was entered into by the seaman…
U.S. v. FultonEntrapment as a matter of law exists only where there is undisputed testimony which shows conclusively and…