From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leight v. W7879 LLC

Court of Appeals of New York.
Mar 24, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2126 (N.Y. 2016)

Opinion

03-24-2016

Douglas L. LEIGHT, et al., Plaintiffs, John H. Masten, Appellant, v. W7879 LLC, et al., Respondents.

Collins, Dobkin & Miller LLP, New York City (Seth A. Miller of counsel), for appellant. Kucker & Bruh, LLP, New York City (Patrick K. Munson of counsel), for respondents. Himmelstein, McConnell, Gribben, Donoghue & Joseph, New York City (Ronald S. Languedoc of counsel), for Metropolitan Council on Housing, amicus curiae.


Collins, Dobkin & Miller LLP, New York City (Seth A. Miller of counsel), for appellant.

Kucker & Bruh, LLP, New York City (Patrick K. Munson of counsel), for respondents.

Himmelstein, McConnell, Gribben, Donoghue & Joseph, New York City (Ronald S. Languedoc of counsel), for Metropolitan Council on Housing, amicus curiae.

Opinion

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. Plaintiff John H. Masten failed to establish that his apartment, which was de-regulated in 2000 by an unchallenged order of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal, became re-regulated when he executed a renewal lease at market rate.

Chief Judge DIFIORE and Judges PIGOTT, RIVERA, ABDUS–SALAAM, STEIN, FAHEY and GARCIA concur.


Summaries of

Leight v. W7879 LLC

Court of Appeals of New York.
Mar 24, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2126 (N.Y. 2016)
Case details for

Leight v. W7879 LLC

Case Details

Full title:Douglas L. LEIGHT, et al., Plaintiffs, John H. Masten, Appellant, v. W7879…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Mar 24, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2126 (N.Y. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2126
28 N.Y.S.3d 679
48 N.E.3d 960

Citing Cases

Suarez v. Four Thirty Realty LLC

Defendants are correct that plaintiffs had a full and fair opportunity to participate in the proceedings held…

Dugan v. London Terrace Gardens, L.P.

Plaintiffs do not maintain that those class members' claims here are in any way different from the claims…