From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leigh v. Com., Bd. of Finance Revenue

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 20, 1995
661 A.2d 1374 (Pa. 1995)

Opinion

Submitted June 2, 1995.

Decided July 20, 1995.

Appeal No. 4 M.D. Appeal Docket 1995, from the order of the Commonwealth Court, 168 Pa. Commw. 12, 648 A.2d 1346 (1994), dated December 15, 1994, at No. 232 F.R. 1992.

Ronald H. Skubecz, Harrisburg, for Commonwealth.

Richard I. Torpey, Huntingdon Valley, for Leigh et ux.

Before NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY, ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE and MONTEMURO, JJ.


We affirm on the basis that the disclaimer executed by Planned Parenthood pursuant to 20 Pa.C.S.A. § 6205(a) made the transfer of real property to an inter vivos trust, of which Planned Parenthood had been a beneficiary, exempt from realty transfer tax.

We do not reach the question of whether, in the absence of the disclaimer, the transfer would have been subject to tax.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.


Summaries of

Leigh v. Com., Bd. of Finance Revenue

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 20, 1995
661 A.2d 1374 (Pa. 1995)
Case details for

Leigh v. Com., Bd. of Finance Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Francis A. LEIGH and Lucy Z. Leigh, His Wife, Appellee, v. COMMONWEALTH of…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 20, 1995

Citations

661 A.2d 1374 (Pa. 1995)
661 A.2d 1374

Citing Cases

Tyson v. Com

However, they point out that every tax statute must be construed strictly against the Commonwealth, and any…

Philadelphia Gas Works v. Com

However, the rule of strict construction is inapplicable where, as here, there is no reasonable doubt as to…