From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leichtfeld v. Dornbaugh

Appellate Court of Illinois
Jan 23, 1950
339 Ill. App. 281 (Ill. App. Ct. 1950)

Summary

In Leichtfeld v. Dornbaugh, 339 Ill.App. 281, 89 N.E.2d 752 (1950), cited by the district court in support of its order, the appellate court held that a widow's action for an accounting against her deceased husband's father based on an alleged partnership between father and son was time barred when brought more than five years after the husband's death.

Summary of this case from Kedzierski v. Kedzierski

Opinion

Gen. No. 44,973. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed January 23, 1950 Released for publication February 3, 1950

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. CORNELIUS J. HARRINGTON, Judge, presiding.

Affirmed. Heard in the first division, first district, this court at the October term, 1949.

C.C. Ownbey, for appellant;

Swanson, Dodge Dornbaugh and Arthur Abraham, for appellee.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed January 23, 1950; released for publication February 3, 1950.


Summaries of

Leichtfeld v. Dornbaugh

Appellate Court of Illinois
Jan 23, 1950
339 Ill. App. 281 (Ill. App. Ct. 1950)

In Leichtfeld v. Dornbaugh, 339 Ill.App. 281, 89 N.E.2d 752 (1950), cited by the district court in support of its order, the appellate court held that a widow's action for an accounting against her deceased husband's father based on an alleged partnership between father and son was time barred when brought more than five years after the husband's death.

Summary of this case from Kedzierski v. Kedzierski
Case details for

Leichtfeld v. Dornbaugh

Case Details

Full title:Ruth I. Ott Leichtfeld, Individually, and as Administrator of Estate of…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Jan 23, 1950

Citations

339 Ill. App. 281 (Ill. App. Ct. 1950)
89 N.E.2d 752

Citing Cases

Kedzierski v. Kedzierski

Plaintiff never sought to amend his complaint. In Leichtfeld v. Dornbaugh, 339 Ill.App. 281, 89 N.E.2d…

In re Estate of Krevchena

Defendant contends that the alleged partnership in this case was oral and that plaintiff's obligation was to…