From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc. v. Investors Underwriting Managers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 2003
303 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

552

March 20, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered October 17, 2001, which, inter alia, granted the cross motion of defendants Investors Underwriting Managers, Inc. and Carlisle Insurance Co. for summary judgment, declaring that they were not obligated to defend or indemnify plaintiffs, and otherwise dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Michael J. Lenoff, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Nicholas P. Calabria, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Friedman, Gonzalez, JJ.


In view of plaintiff's failure to directly notify defendant Investors of the occurrence, as required by the insurance policy; the fact that Investors was aware that the defense of the action was being provided by the State Insurance Fund, to which the plaintiffs' notice of claim had been sent; and the fact that plaintiff was aware that Investors had already and timely declined the claim by its named insured; the IAS court properly held that the failure to disclaim coverage formally for two months was not unreasonable as a matter of law, and did not violate Insurance Law § 3420(d).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc. v. Investors Underwriting Managers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 2003
303 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc. v. Investors Underwriting Managers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LEHRER McGOVERN BOVIS, INC., ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. INVESTORS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 20, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 278 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 27

Citing Cases

Miraglia v. State Ins. Fund

Although Petitioner claims that SIF may not rely on the exemption stated in § 1108(c), he relies on Bowker v.…