From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lehr v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 30, 1962
16 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

April 30, 1962


In an action by the administrator of a deceased policeman who had been in the defendant's employ, to recover damages for his wrongful death, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 30, 1961, as granted plaintiff's motion to strike out for insufficiency defendant's partial defense (set forth in paragraph eighth of its answer) in mitigation of damages. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. As a partial defense, defendant pleaded that one of the intestate's dependents has received and is receiving a pension from the Police Pension Fund; that another one of his dependents has received the contributions made by him (the intestate) to the Pension Fund; and that these payments should be considered in mitigation of damages. In our opinion, the payments sought to be offset are from a collateral source; hence, they may not be taken into consideration in determining the amount of damages in this action for the intestate's wrongful death ( Jennings v. United States, 291 F.2d 880; United States v. Price, 288 F.2d 448). Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Hill, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lehr v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 30, 1962
16 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

Lehr v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ANTON LEHR, as Administrator of the Estate of ANTON LEHR, JR., Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 30, 1962

Citations

16 A.D.2d 702 (N.Y. App. Div. 1962)

Citing Cases

Szybura v. City of Elmira

The general rule is that damages cannot be mitigated or reduced because of payments received by the injured…

Nykanen v. City of New York

We have not considered the question whether the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury that…