From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lefrak v. Lambert

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 13, 1978
93 Misc. 2d 632 (N.Y. App. Term 1978)

Opinion

January 13, 1978

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County, HERBERT A. POSNER, J.

Epstein Cresci, P.C. (Carl Cresci of counsel), for appellant.

Sherman Sterling (Clarence W. Olmstead, Jr., of counsel), for respondents.


MEMORANDUM.

Judgment of the court below ( 89 Misc.2d 197) unanimously modified by increasing the amount of plaintiff's recovery to $4,222 plus attorney's fees in the sum of $750; as so modified, affirmed, without costs.

Defendant herein vacated his apartment before the expiration of his term and plaintiff relet it some months thereafter. It is our opinion that under the circumstances herein plaintiff is entitled to prevail on his cause of action to recover rent for the period that the apartment remained vacant.

While there seems to be a trend whereby the courts have been modernizing traditional concepts of landlord and tenant law and in some instances have held that a landlord is obligated to attempt to relet premises when a tenant vacates before the expiration of his term, we need not decide whether such rule should be adopted in the case at bar. The evidence adduced at trial established that plaintiff made reasonable and diligent efforts to rerent defendant's apartment (Birchwood Assoc. v Stern, 88 Misc.2d 937).

In addition, the record was sufficient to support a finding that plaintiff was entitled to the sum of $750 as reasonable attorney's fees.

Concur: PINO, P.J., RINALDI and BUSCHMANN, JJ.


Summaries of

Lefrak v. Lambert

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Jan 13, 1978
93 Misc. 2d 632 (N.Y. App. Term 1978)
Case details for

Lefrak v. Lambert

Case Details

Full title:SAM LEFRAK, Doing Business as MANDALAY LEASING CO., Appellant, v. KENNETH…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1978

Citations

93 Misc. 2d 632 (N.Y. App. Term 1978)

Citing Cases

Wallis v. Falken-Smith

In this case we are not required to determine whether the old rule excluding landlords from the usual…

Schnee v. Jonas Equities

While that appears to have been the law from hoary days of yore (Becar v Flues, 64 N.Y. 518), we have…