From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lefebvre v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 24, 1985
758 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-7465.

Argued and Submitted April 5, 1985.

Decided April 24, 1985.

Joanne Mickelson Rocks, Anaheim, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.

Steven Parks, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.

On appeal from a decision of the United States Tax Court.

Before HUG and BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON, District Judge.

Honorable Bruce R. Thompson, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.


Lefebvre appeals the Tax Court's decision that he consented to an extension of the statute of limitations on his 1971 tax return. Lefebvre contends that the power of attorney filed on his behalf with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was invalid because it did not comply with IRS regulations. In the alternative, he argues that his attorney's signature on one of the actual consents filed was not genuine. For the reasons given by the Tax Court in its opinion, T.C.M. 1984-202, 47 T.C.M. (CCH) 1572, we hold that noncompliance with the IRS regulations did not invalidate the power of attorney, and that Lefebvre failed to show that his attorney's signature was not genuine. The decision of the Tax Court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Lefebvre v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 24, 1985
758 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir. 1985)
Case details for

Lefebvre v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:JAMES K. LEFEBVRE, PETITIONER/APPELLANT, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 24, 1985

Citations

758 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Soni v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

The burden of proof is on the Sonis to prove that the power of attorney was invalid. See Pleasanton Gravel…

Roszkos v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Respondent's position is not without merit, but due to our holding that petitioners' actual knowledge of the…