From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LEEF v. EVERS

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 19, 1976
88 Misc. 2d 178 (N.Y. App. Term 1976)

Opinion

May 19, 1976

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County, SHANLEY N. EGETH, J.

W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (L. Kevin Sheridan and Irving Cohen of counsel), for appellant.

Joel L. Leef, respondent pro se.


In the absence of an appropriate showing by plaintiff of the relevant surrounding circumstances including the efforts, if any, made to obtain the desired information by other means and the alternative unavailability of such information, it was an abuse of discretion to deny appellant's application to quash the subpoena and to direct it to transmit the specified information.

Order entered February 27, 1975 (EGETH, J.) reversed and motion to quash subpoena granted, with $10 costs.

Concur: MARKOWITZ, J.P., HUGHES and RICCOBONO, JJ.


Summaries of

LEEF v. EVERS

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
May 19, 1976
88 Misc. 2d 178 (N.Y. App. Term 1976)
Case details for

LEEF v. EVERS

Case Details

Full title:JOEL L. LEEF, Respondent, v. CORNELIUS EVERS, Also Known as NEAL EVERS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: May 19, 1976

Citations

88 Misc. 2d 178 (N.Y. App. Term 1976)
387 N.Y.S.2d 33

Citing Cases

Strecker v. Sarafian

The plaintiff has failed to make a showing that the presentence investigation report is necessary to the…

People v. Sanitation Indus

It has been recognized that a restrictive interpretation of this language would present difficulties in the…