From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 1, 2015
623 F. App'x 886 (9th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 13-15434

12-01-2015

KEE LEE, DBA Chin's Market and Kitchen, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00881-AWI-SAB MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California
Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Kee Lee, DBA Chin's Market and Kitchen, appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment in his 7 U.S.C. § 2023 action seeking judicial review of the United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service's ("FNS") final decision permanently disqualifying his store from participating in the federal food stamp program. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's legal conclusions and for clear error its factual findings. Wong v. United States, 859 F.2d 129, 131 (9th Cir. 1988). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Lee failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the hundreds of suspicious transactions identified by FNS did not show that Lee was trafficking in food stamps. See 7 U.S.C. § 2021(b)(3)(B) (providing for permanent disqualification from participation in the federal food stamp program on the first occasion of trafficking); 7 C.F.R. § 271.2 (defining trafficking as "[t]he buying, selling, stealing, or otherwise effecting an exchange of [food stamp] benefits issued and accessed . . . for cash or consideration other than eligible food . . . . "); see also Kim v. United States, 121 F.3d 1269, 1272 (9th Cir. 1997) ("The burden is placed upon the store owner to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the violations did not occur.").

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Lee v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Dec 1, 2015
623 F. App'x 886 (9th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Lee v. United States

Case Details

Full title:KEE LEE, DBA Chin's Market and Kitchen, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 1, 2015

Citations

623 F. App'x 886 (9th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Rashid v. United States

See 7 U.S.C. § 2021(b)(3); 7 C.F.R. § 278.6. Such a penalty is warranted for even a single trafficking…

Mann v. United States

"District Courts have consistently held that a pattern of rapid, repetitive large transactions is sufficient…