From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 5, 1919
86 Tex. Crim. 203 (Tex. Crim. App. 1919)

Summary

observing that Texas Constitution did not mandate jury trial for prosecution of juvenile because charged offense was not a felony

Summary of this case from Farris v. State

Opinion

No. 5520.

Decided November 5, 1919.

Juvenile Delinquent — Waiving Jury — Misdemeanor.

Where defendant was tried under a complaint and information as a juvenile delinquent, article 1195, C.C.P., and waived a jury and was convicted; not being prosecuted for a felony, there was no reversible error. Following: Shulman v. State, 76 Tex. Crim. 229, and other cases.

Appeal from the District Court of Hale, sitting in chambers as a Juvenile Court. Tried below before the Hon. R.C. Joiner, judge.

Appeal from a conviction of a juvenile delinquent; penalty, confinement in the State Industrial School for Boys at Gatesville for a period of not less than two years, and not longer than the date when he shall reach the age of twenty-one years.

The opinion states the case.

M.J. Baird, for appellant. — Cited cases in the opinion.

Alvin M. Owsley, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.


The appellant, under complaint and information, was prosecuted and convicted as a juvenile delinquent under Article 1195, Code of Criminal Procedure. The judgment orders that he be confined in the State Industrial School for Boys at Gatesville for a period of not less than two years, and not longer than the date when he shall reach the age of twenty-one years.

The appellant, at the time the offense was committed and at the time of the trial, was between sixteen and seventeen years of age. The proof supports the allegation in the information, and the only question raised is the power of the court under the Constitution to impose the sentence without the verdict of a jury. The judgment discloses that a jury was waived. This the appellant had the right to do, the prosecution not being for a felony. The Constitution has been uniformly so construed by this court. See Moore v. State, 22 Texas App., 117; Schulman v. State, 76 Tex.Crim. Rep., 173 S.W. Rep., 1195.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Lee v. the State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Nov 5, 1919
86 Tex. Crim. 203 (Tex. Crim. App. 1919)

observing that Texas Constitution did not mandate jury trial for prosecution of juvenile because charged offense was not a felony

Summary of this case from Farris v. State

observing that Texas Constitution did not mandate jury trial for prosecution of juvenile because charged offense was not a felony

Summary of this case from Farris v. State
Case details for

Lee v. the State

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN LEE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Nov 5, 1919

Citations

86 Tex. Crim. 203 (Tex. Crim. App. 1919)
215 S.W. 856

Citing Cases

Farris v. State

" (internal citations omitted)), overruled on other grounds byComer v. State , 754 S.W.2d 656 (Tex. Crim.…

Patton v. United States

umber of States, and in every instance the constitutionality of such a statute has been upheld. Connelly v.…