From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Nucor-Yamato Steel Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Apr 11, 2013
CASE NO. 3:07CV00098 BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:07CV00098 BSM

04-11-2013

DANNY LEE PLAINTIFF v. NUCOR-YAMATO STEEL COMPANY LP AND NUCOR CORPORATION DEFENDANTS


ORDER

Now pending are the parties' objections to designations and counter-designations of deposition and trial testimony. Because the parties have indicated that they no longer intend to use a number of the depositions they initially designated, the only objections relevant at this time are plaintiff's objections to defendants' designations of testimony from Joe Stratman's deposition [Doc. No. 108] and defendants' objections to plaintiff's counter-designations of testimony from Stratman and Michael Hooks's depositions [Doc. No. 106]. Also ripe for review are defendants' objections [Doc. Nos. 163, 164] to plaintiff's designations of Rodney Washington and Ozzie Green's trial testimony in Bennett v. Nucor Corp., Case No. 3:04CV00291. The rulings on these objections are as follows. A. Plaintiff's objections to designations from Joe Stratman's deposition

Plaintiff's objection to designation 165:14 to 169:3 from Stratman's deposition is sustained as to the testimony from 165:13-167:8, and overruled as to the testimony from 167:9-169:3. Plaintiff's objection to designation 181:19-186:12 is sustained but on the condition that the testimony from 181:19-183:20, where Stratman testifies about statements made to him by other Nucor employees, can not be offered for the truth of the matter asserted. Those statements can only be offered to show the basis for the course of action taken by Stratman. Finally, plaintiff's objection to designation 203:8-204:20 is sustained. B. Defendants' objections to counter-designations from Joe Stratman and Michael Hooks's depositions

Defendants' objections to plaintiff's counter-designations from the depositions of Stratman and Hooks are all overruled. C. Defendants' objections to designations from Rodney Washington's trial testimony

Defendants' objections to the following designations from Washington's trial testimony are sustained: 126:17-126:25; 153:15-153:17; 205:11-205:18; 206:8-207:6; and 212:22-214:16. The remaining objections are overruled. D. Defendants' objections to designations from Ozzie Green's trial testimony

Defendants' objections to the following designations from Green's trial testimony are sustained: 220:25-221:11; 235:7-235:9; 237:25-238:4; 260:17-261:25; 316:10-316:25; and 317:1-318:6. Defendants' objection to designation 224:8-225:17 is sustained only as to lines 8-9 on page 224. Defendants' objection to designation 243:2-243:8 is sustained only as to line 2 on page 243. Finally, defendants' objection to designation 256:15-257:5 is sustained only as to lines 15-16 on page 256.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of April 2013.

_________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lee v. Nucor-Yamato Steel Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION
Apr 11, 2013
CASE NO. 3:07CV00098 BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Lee v. Nucor-Yamato Steel Co.

Case Details

Full title:DANNY LEE PLAINTIFF v. NUCOR-YAMATO STEEL COMPANY LP AND NUCOR CORPORATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS JONESBORO DIVISION

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 3:07CV00098 BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 11, 2013)