Opinion
2012-10-5
LEE FANG, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC. and Superior Heating Co., LLC, Defendants–Respondents.
Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D'Amico, J.), dated May 11, 2011. The order affirmed an oral decision of the Tonawanda City Court (Mark E. Saltarelli, J.), which dismissed plaintiff's small claims action. Lee Fang, Plaintiff–Appellant Pro Se. Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse (Kristin L. Norfleet of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent Home Depot USA, Inc.
Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (Michael L. D'Amico, J.), dated May 11, 2011. The order affirmed an oral decision of the Tonawanda City Court (Mark E. Saltarelli, J.), which dismissed plaintiff's small claims action.
Lee Fang, Plaintiff–Appellant Pro Se. Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse (Kristin L. Norfleet of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent Home Depot USA, Inc.
Law Office of Ralph C. Lorigo, West Seneca (Ralph C. Lorigo of Counsel), for Defendant–Respondent Superior Heating Co., LLC.
MEMORANDUM:
Plaintiff commenced this small claims action in City Court seeking damages for defendants' negligent installation and repair of an HVAC unit in plaintiff's house. After trial, City Court orally dismissed the claim from the bench. Plaintiff took an appeal to County Court despite the absence of an appealable paper, and that court issued an order affirming the “judgment” of City Court that dismissed plaintiff's claim. This appeal must be dismissed ( seeCPLR 5703[b]; Shapiro v. Tony's Culver Atl., Inc., 90 A.D.3d 1501, 1502, 934 N.Y.S.2d 883;Kuhn v. Kuhn, 129 A.D.2d 967, 967, 514 N.Y.S.2d 284). An appeal may be taken to this Court as of right “from an order of a county court ... which determines an appeal from a judgment of a lower court” (CPLR 5703[b]; see Ellingsworth v. City of Watertown, 113 A.D.2d 1013, 1014, 494 N.Y.S.2d 587;see also Pigler v. Adam, Meldrum & Anderson Co., 195 A.D.2d 1011, 1011, 602 N.Y.S.2d 572). No appeal lies, however, from an oral decision ( seeUCCA 1702; Kuhn, 129 A.D.2d at 967, 514 N.Y.S.2d 284). Indeed, we note that the Uniform City Court Act contemplates the entry of a judgment in a small claims action for purposes of review and enforcement ( see UCCA 1805[a]; see generally UCCA art 18), and the entry of a judgment or final order in City Court is a necessary predicate to the appellate jurisdiction of both County Court and this Court ( seeUCCA 1702; CPLR 5703[b] ). The entry of an appealable paper also is essential to the finality of such cases because such entry limits the time within which an appeal may be taken in the first instance ( seeUCCA 1703; CPLR 5513[a] ). Thus, it is incumbent upon a court to ensure that a small claims action is terminated by the entry of a judgment or final order. Here, neither a judgment nor final order from City Court is contained in the record on appeal, and nothing in the record establishes that a judgment or final order was ever filed in City Court.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.