From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lederle v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 1, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-01736-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2011)

Summary

characterizing epidural steroid injections as conservative treatment

Summary of this case from Rhinehart v. Colvin

Opinion

Case No. 1:09-cv-01736-JLT.

June 1, 2011


ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONDENT TO FILE A RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES (Doc. 22)


Through counsel, the parties have stipulated to an extension of time for Respondent to file his response to the pending Motion for Attorney Fees. (Doc. 22) The extension is based upon counsel's heavy workload and the recent reassignment of personnel and duties within the Office of the General Counsel. Id. Good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS that Respondent SHALL file his response no later than July 18, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lederle v. Astrue

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jun 1, 2011
Case No. 1:09-cv-01736-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2011)

characterizing epidural steroid injections as conservative treatment

Summary of this case from Rhinehart v. Colvin
Case details for

Lederle v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LONITA LEDERLE, Appellant, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 1, 2011

Citations

Case No. 1:09-cv-01736-JLT (E.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2011)

Citing Cases

Rhinehart v. Colvin

Tr. 409-10, 423, 439. Compare Samaniego v. Astrue, (C.D. Cal. 2012) 2012 WL 254030 (unpublished opinion)…