From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lech v. Huntmore Estates Condo. Ass'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 29, 2016
498 Mich. 968 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 151943. COA No. 320028.

01-29-2016

Ronald W. LECH II, Plaintiff/Counter–Defendant–Appellee, v. HUNTMORE ESTATES CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Defendant/Counter–Plaintiff, and Jacobson Ore Creek Land Development, L.L.C., and Scott R. Jacobson, d/b/a S.R. Jacobson Land Development, L.L.C., Defendants–Appellants.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE Section IV of the Court of Appeals judgment, and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration. On remand, the Court of Appeals shall consider whether its decision that the defendants are not entitled to post-judgment interest under MCL 600.6013 on their sanctions award is consistent with Ayar v. Foodland Distributors, 472 Mich. 713, 717, 698 N.W.2d 875 (2005). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

Lech v. Huntmore Estates Condo. Ass'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 29, 2016
498 Mich. 968 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

Lech v. Huntmore Estates Condo. Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:Ronald W. LECH II, Plaintiff/Counter–Defendant–Appellee, v. HUNTMORE…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jan 29, 2016

Citations

498 Mich. 968 (Mich. 2016)
873 N.W.2d 304

Citing Cases

Lech v. Huntmore Estates Condo. Ass'n

Our Supreme Court vacated the portion of this Court's opinion holding that the developers were not entitled…

Lech v. Huntmore Estates Condo. Ass'n

Our Supreme Court vacated the portion of this Court's opinion holding that the developers were not entitled…