From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lea-Scandrett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 8, 2002
804 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

vacating order denying newer motion and remanding for the trial court to dismiss that motion

Summary of this case from Davis v. State

Opinion

No. 1D00-4781

Filed January 8, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. Dedee S. Costello, Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The trial court denied on its merits the appellant's Rule 3.800(a) motion, which was filed while an appeal of the appellant's previous Rule 3.800(a) motion was pending in this Court. The trial court should have dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Williams v. State, 26 Fla. L. Weekly D1307 (Fla. 1st DCA May 24, 2001). Accordingly, we vacate the order denying the motion and remand for the trial court to dismiss the motion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

BOOTH, BARFIELD and PADOVANO, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Lea-Scandrett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 8, 2002
804 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

vacating order denying newer motion and remanding for the trial court to dismiss that motion

Summary of this case from Davis v. State
Case details for

Lea-Scandrett v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL A. LEA-SCANDRETT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 8, 2002

Citations

804 So. 2d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Davis v. State

We must further conclude that the January 13, 2009 order on the second rule 3.800(a) motion was entered while…

Bryant v. State

This list provides merely a prime example of cases which, despite being in conflict with the modern trend,…