From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Layton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 7, 1990
570 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-03535.

December 7, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Ted Brousseau, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Charles Corces, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's conviction and sentence for one count of sale of cocaine. We vacate the conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine on the authority of V.A.A. v. State, 561 So.2d 314 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). As in V.A.A., we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question of great public importance:

WHEN A DOUBLE JEOPARDY VIOLATION IS ALLEGED BASED ON THE CRIMES OF SALE AND POSSESSION (OR POSSESSION WITH INTENT TO SELL) OF THE SAME QUANTUM OF CONTRABAND AND THE CRIMES OCCURRED AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF SECTION 775.021, FLORIDA STATUTES (SUPP. 1988), IS IT IMPROPER TO CONVICT AND SENTENCE FOR BOTH CRIMES?

LEHAN, A.C.J., and HALL, J., concur.


Summaries of

Layton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 7, 1990
570 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Layton v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEREK LAYTON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 7, 1990

Citations

570 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Holmes v. State

The First and the Second District Courts of Appeal have ruled contrary to Davis and have certified the…