From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawson v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Aug 26, 1975
539 P.2d 116 (Nev. 1975)

Opinion

No. 8066

August 26, 1975

Appeal from Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Paul S. Goldman, Judge.

Morgan D. Harris, Public Defender, and Robert L. Stott, Chief Deputy Public Defender, Clark County, for Appellant.

Robert List, Attorney General; George A. Holt, District Attorney, and Dan M. Seaton, Chief Deputy District Attorney, Clark County, for Respondent.


OPINION


Appellant's sole contention in this appeal suggests we should reverse a judgment of conviction and sentence because the trial judge refused to give a requested jury instruction which did not accurately state the applicable law.

He has cited no relevant authority in support of the contention; and, in fact the law is otherwise. See Harris v. State, 83 Nev. 404, 407, 432 P.2d 929, 931 (1967), where we said: ". . . [R]equested instructions must properly state the law. The appellant can claim no right to have requested instructions given when they do not correctly state the law. Without such right a refusal is not error." See also, State v. Sheeley, 63 Nev. 88, 162 P.2d 96 (1945).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Lawson v. State

Supreme Court of Nevada
Aug 26, 1975
539 P.2d 116 (Nev. 1975)
Case details for

Lawson v. State

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD GENE LAWSON, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Aug 26, 1975

Citations

539 P.2d 116 (Nev. 1975)
539 P.2d 116

Citing Cases

Lloyd v. State

Our review of Lloyd's proffered instructions convinces us that to the extent that they are not erroneous…