From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawry v. Yeaton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Somerset
Jan 7, 1942
23 A.2d 890 (Me. 1942)

Opinion

Opinion, January 7, 1942.

Factual Issues for the Jury. Agreement as to Amount of Damages Amends Writ in that Respect.

Factual issues are for the jury. In the instant case the record of conflicting versions does not show that the jury erred.

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL BY DEFENDANT.

Action for property damage alleged to have resulted from negligent operation of truck by defendant's admitted agent. The jury found for the plaintiff.

Motion for new trial overruled. Case fully appears in opinion.

James R. Desmond, Portland, for plaintiff.

Locke, Campbell Reid, Augusta, for defendant.

SITTING: STURGIS, C. J., THAXTER, HUDSON, MANSER, WORSTER, MURCHIE, JJ.


On defendant's general motion for new trial. The action is one of tort brought to recover property damages claimed to have resulted proximately from negligent operation of the defendant's truck by his admitted agent. The jury found for the plaintiff and assessed damages at $700, the amount agreed upon if liability were established. The insufficient ad damnum in the writ will be deemed to have been amended. The only issues raised were factual and were peculiarly within the province of the jury. The applicable principles of law were not in controversy. The record, disclosing conflicting versions, does not show that the jury manifestly erred in accepting that of the plaintiff.

Motion overruled.


Summaries of

Lawry v. Yeaton

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Somerset
Jan 7, 1942
23 A.2d 890 (Me. 1942)
Case details for

Lawry v. Yeaton

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES A. LAWRY vs. CLARENCE F. YEATON

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Somerset

Date published: Jan 7, 1942

Citations

23 A.2d 890 (Me. 1942)
23 A.2d 890

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Scott v. Taylor

It was held in the case of Colonial Village Restaurants, Inc. v. Colonial Village, Inc., 315 Ill. App. 237,…