From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Law Enforc. Health Ben. v. City of Phil

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 12, 1997
456 Pa. Super. 31 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997)

Opinion

Submitted November 26, 1996.

Filed February 12, 1997.

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Civil Division at No. March Term, 1994-2453, Moss, J.

Nancy A. Walker, Philadelphia, for appellant.

Frank Finch, III, Philadelphia, for City of Philadelphia, appellee.

Alphonso A. Tumini, Philadelphia, for Police and Fire Medical Association, appellee.

Before CAVANAUGH, CIRILLO, BECK, POPOVICH, JOHNSON, HUDOCK, FORD ELLIOTT, SAYLOR and EAKIN, JJ.


Law Enforcement Health Benefits, Inc. ("LEHB"), appeals from the order that denied its petition to open a judgment of non pros. The trial court entered the judgment pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 218 because LEHB's counsel failed to appear at the status call of the list for an assignment of a trial date. We reverse.

LEHB contends on appeal that: (1) the trial court lacked authority to enter the judgment of non pros; (2) the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to open the judgment of non pros; and (3) LEHB was entitled to a hearing before the trial court to determine whether counsel's excuse for failing to attend the status call was reasonable.

Based upon this Court's Opinion in Gendrachi v. Cassidy, 455 Pa. Super. 518, 688 A.2d 1215 (1997) (en banc), we conclude that the trial court lacked authority to enter the judgment of non pros. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order and remand the matter for proceedings consistent with Gendrachi.

Because of our resolution of LEHB's first contention, we need not address its remaining assertions of error.

Order REVERSED. Case REMANDED. Jurisdiction RELINQUISHED.

CIRILLO, J., concurs in the result.


Summaries of

Law Enforc. Health Ben. v. City of Phil

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Feb 12, 1997
456 Pa. Super. 31 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997)
Case details for

Law Enforc. Health Ben. v. City of Phil

Case Details

Full title:LAW ENFORCEMENT HEALTH BENEFITS, INC., Appellant, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA…

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 12, 1997

Citations

456 Pa. Super. 31 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997)
689 A.2d 309

Citing Cases

Valle v. Caroline

Id. at 1217 ("Rule 218's sanction simply does not apply to this procedure."). See Shanahan v. Groen, 689 A.2d…