From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laurin v. Patrick Construction Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1942
263 App. Div. 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

March 23, 1942.


Action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff by reason of the fall of a scaffold furnished by appellant, upon which scaffold plaintiff was working, installing stained glass in a church window, and which scaffold in its construction was in violation of section 240 Lab. of the Labor Law and certain pleaded rules and regulations of the Board of Standards and Appeals of the Department of Labor. Judgment, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur. Close, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment in so far as appealed from and to grant a new trial as to appellant, on the ground that the refusal of the court to charge on the question of contributory negligence was error. ( Karpeles v. Heine, 227 N.Y. 74; De Nisi v. Krugman Co., Inc., 256 App. Div. 567.)


Summaries of

Laurin v. Patrick Construction Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1942
263 App. Div. 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Laurin v. Patrick Construction Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL F. LAURIN, Respondent, v. PATRICK CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1942

Citations

263 App. Div. 1013 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

Koenig v. Patrick Construction Corp.

There was a nondelegable duty to furnish, under section 240 Lab. of the Labor Law, a good device, if the…

Koenig v. Patrick Constr. Corp.

Such an interpretation manifestly rules out contributory negligence as a defense to an action predicated upon…