From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laurenzano v. Laurenzano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1989
156 A.D.2d 430 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 11, 1989

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Kings County (Bloom, S.).


Ordered that the decree is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

This action was commenced in the Supreme Court, Kings County, by the decedent Michael Laurenzano, who alleged that he had been defrauded by his son Salvatore Laurenzano into conveying his property to his grandchildren, the codefendants Michael S. Laurenzano and Carolyn N. Laurenzano. The action was transferred to the Surrogate's Court after the death of the plaintiff Michael Laurenzano, and after the issuance of letters of administration. The Surrogate, after a trial without a jury, concluded that the estate of Michael Laurenzano was entitled to recover damages for the allegedly fraudulent conveyance.

The Surrogate properly found, based on all the evidence, that a confidential relationship had existed between the decedent Michael Laurenzano and his son Salvatore. The Surrogate also properly held that in view of that relationship, the gratuitous conveyance of the subject property by Michael to Salvatore's children (Michael's grandchildren) was presumptively fraudulent, and that it was therefore Salvatore's burden to prove that the transfer constituted a legitimate gift (see, Matter of Gordon v Bialystoker Center Bikur Cholim, 45 N.Y.2d 692, 699; Jones v Jones, 137 N.Y. 610; 43 N.Y. Jur 2d, Deeds, § 225, at 420-421). Salvatore failed to meet that burden. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Laurenzano v. Laurenzano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1989
156 A.D.2d 430 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Laurenzano v. Laurenzano

Case Details

Full title:LUCY LAURENZANO, as Administratrix of the Estate of MICHAEL LAURENZANO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 430 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
548 N.Y.S.2d 547

Citing Cases

McGlashan v. McGlashan

. the defendant/estate's long-standing failure to produce an accounting, to which plaintiff was absolutely…

McCoy v. Goldberg

The principle articulated by Justice Cardozo in Meinhard — that a fiduciary may be held liable without proof…