From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lassiter v. Reece

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Jul 22, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:07-885-HFF-JRM (D.S.C. Jul. 22, 2008)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:07-885-HFF-JRM.

July 22, 2008


ORDER


This case was filed as a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting that (1) the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Spartanburg Public Safety Department, Reece, Suber, Dean, Edwards, Smith, Hall, Collins, Burgess, and Gallman be granted; and (2) the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Wright be granted. The Report further recommends that Defendants John Doe and Jane Doe be dismissed sua sponte without prejudice. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on June 13, 2008, and the Clerk of Court entered Plaintiff's objections to the Report on June 27, 2008. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's objection memorandum, but finds the objections contained therein to be without merit.

After a thorough review of the Report, the objections thereto, and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court overrules Plaintiff's objections, adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of this Court that (1) the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Spartanburg Public Safety Department, Reece, Suber, Dean, Edwards, Smith, Hall, Collins, Burgess, and Gallman be GRANTED and (2) the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Wright be GRANTED. Further, Defendants John Doe and Jane Doe are DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed in Spartanburg, South Carolina.

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within 30 days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Lassiter v. Reece

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
Jul 22, 2008
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:07-885-HFF-JRM (D.S.C. Jul. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Lassiter v. Reece

Case Details

Full title:HARDY LASSITER III, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM REECE; T. SUBER; OFFICER DEAN…

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division

Date published: Jul 22, 2008

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:07-885-HFF-JRM (D.S.C. Jul. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

Webb v. Lott

Next, “[t]he court must also consider the extent of the injuries caused to the plaintiff.” Lassiter v. …

Raulerson v. Alred

This includes evidence of "visible injury at the time of the incident" and "medical evidence of serious…