From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lasry v. Lasry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1992
180 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

February 11, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.).


Courts of this State generally will accord recognition to the judgments rendered in a foreign country under the doctrine of comity absent a showing of fraud in the procurement of the foreign judgment or unless recognition of the judgment would offend a strong policy of New York (Greschler v. Greschler, 51 N.Y.2d 368, 376). The Swiss court's injunction freezing defendant's Geneva bank account should be left undisturbed, not only upon considerations of comity but also in recognition of the need to preserve what is possibly a substantial marital asset for equitable distribution.

In view of defendant's failure adequately to explain the discrepancy between his claimed living expenses and annual income, and proof that plaintiff, a 37-year old homemaker, has only dividend and interest income of $14,000 a year, while defendant, a 51-year old retired investment banker, has income of $132,000 a year, the court's award of $1,000 a week temporary maintenance and $500 a week child support, represents a measured "accommodation between the reasonable needs of the moving spouse and the financial ability of the other spouse" (Shapiro v Shapiro, 163 A.D.2d 294, 296).

Finally, it was within the sound discretion of the IAS court, pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Temporary Regulation (26 CFR) § 1.71-1T (a) to provide that the maintenance payments be neither deductible to him nor taxable to plaintiff.

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Lasry v. Lasry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 11, 1992
180 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Lasry v. Lasry

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET LASRY, Respondent-Appellant, v. ERIC LASRY, Appellant-Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 11, 1992

Citations

180 A.D.2d 488 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
579 N.Y.S.2d 393

Citing Cases

ALLSTATE v. ADMINISTRATIA ASIGURARILOR DE STAT

At common law, however, there is an another potential avenue for the enforcement of the Bucharest Judgement.…

S.M. v. M.M.-M.

In making an award of pendente lite child support, "[t]he courts strive to seek a reasonable balance between…