From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lasko v. Lasko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

January, 1931.


Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendant to answer within five days from service of a copy of the order herein. Whether or not the defendant's conduct as it may be evidenced under the allegations contained in paragraph 6 of the complaint would sustain a decree of separation may only be determined upon the trial. ( Pearson v. Pearson, 230 N.Y. 141; Tower v. Tower, 134 App. Div. 670.) As a matter of mere pleading paragraph 6 is sufficient in law. Paragraph 5, however, is insufficient. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lasko v. Lasko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1931
232 App. Div. 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Lasko v. Lasko

Case Details

Full title:BELLA LASKO, Respondent, v. MEYER LASKO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1931

Citations

232 App. Div. 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)