From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanzello v. Lakritz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 22, 2001
287 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

October 22, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Carter, J.), dated March 30, 2001, as granted the plaintiff's motion for a protective order quashing a nonparty subpoena served upon the treating physician of the plaintiff's decedent.

Weiner, Millo Morgan, LLC, New York, N.Y. (Scott Morgan of counsel), for appellants.

Gregory James Volpe, Garden City, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A party seeking discovery from a nonparty witness must show special circumstances ( see, Dioguardi v. St. John's Riverside Hosp., 144 A.D.2d 333, 334). The existence of such special circumstances is not established merely upon a showing that the information sought is relevant. Rater, special circumstances are shown by establishing that the information sought cannot be obtained from other sources ( see, Murphy v. Macarthur Holding B., 269 A.D.2d 507; Patterson v. St. Francis Ctr. at Knolls, 249 A.D.2d 457; Anderson v. Kamalian, 231 A.D.2d 659; Dioguardi v. St. John's Riverside Hosp., supra). Here, the Supreme Court properly determined that the defendants did not show special circumstances and therefore properly granted the plaintiff's motion for a protective order quashing the subpoena served on the treating physician of the plaintiff's decedent.

RITTER, J. P., GOLDSTEIN, FRIEDMANN and CRANE, H., concur.


Summaries of

Lanzello v. Lakritz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 22, 2001
287 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Lanzello v. Lakritz

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH A. LANZELLO, ETC., respondent, v. MARK R. LAKRITZ, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 22, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 763

Citing Cases

Kooper v. Kooper

Subsequent to the Fourth Department's decision in Catalano, the First Department cited Dioguardi with…

Tuebner v. Cardinal Health 414, Inc.

"10. Subsequent to Dioguardi, many of our cases involving nonparty discovery continued to hold that "special…