From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lanier v. Wachovia Bank

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 24, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 2:09-cv-4566-WY (E.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 2010)

Summary

rejecting taxpayer's argument that the federal government only had the power to tax her for the activities of cotton and distilled spirits

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Beeman

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION No. 2:09-cv-4566-WY.

March 24, 2010


Order


AND NOW on this 24th day of March, 2010, upon consideration of the motion to dismiss (Docket No. 4) of defendant, Wachovia Bank, plaintiff's opposition thereto, Wachovia's reply, and plaintiff's response thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Lanier v. Wachovia Bank

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 24, 2010
CIVIL ACTION No. 2:09-cv-4566-WY (E.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 2010)

rejecting taxpayer's argument that the federal government only had the power to tax her for the activities of cotton and distilled spirits

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Beeman
Case details for

Lanier v. Wachovia Bank

Case Details

Full title:CLAUDIA LANIER, Plaintiff, v. WACHOVIA BANK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 24, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION No. 2:09-cv-4566-WY (E.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 2010)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Beeman

As to Beeman's first contention — that the United States lacks power to tax beyond tobacco, distilled liquor…

Nicholson v. The Atl. Grp.

Nicholson v. UNIFY Fin. Credit Union, No. 21-2095, 2022 WL 595139 (4th Cir. Feb. 28, 2022) (affirming same);…